How to Do a Critical Review of a Podcast

Introduction

News podcasts and documentary podcasts, like news stories or visual documentaries, adhere to specific codes and conventions in order to develop accuracy and maintain certain ethical standards that a listener would not find in a theatrical or dramatic podcast. Ane fashion of thinking about the difference between the two is fiction and nonfiction. A dramatic or theatrical podcast is fiction. They are complimentary to play with the truth, embellish, even create storylines in order to institute a relationship with the audience. However, a news or documentary podcast is like nonfiction. Their chore is to bring balance, insight, and a certain level of objectivity to a subject by remaining as true-blue to the source(southward) involved.

Why information technology Matters

In 1938 Orson Welles made an infamous radio broadcast the night earlier Halloween. "The State of war of the Worlds" was a dramatic circulate, but it employed elements of news reporting, similar news bulletins, which caused confusion in the audience and panic in certain parts of America. This "Hoax Broadcast" blurred the lines between news broadcasts (nonfiction) and dramatic broadcasts (fiction) and shows the importance of an audience existence able to distinguish betwixt fact and fiction.

More recently, Alex Jones, radio testify host of the Alex Jones Show and possessor of the Infowars website, publicly apologized for his function in promoting "Pizzagate," after a gunman opened fire in a restaurant. The "Pizzagate" conspiracy theory claimed Hillary Clinton and members of her presidential campaign were running a child sexual activity trafficking band out of Washington D. C. pizzeria. Jones has also used his radio circulate to merits that the Sandyhook School Shooting was staged and that the US regime played a role in the ix/eleven Terror attacks. Like his broadcast, his news site Infowars is an example of fake news.

Seeing information technology in Exercise

Every circulate podcast needs to be analyzed critically by an active, engaged, and most importantly, an educated audition. Use the criteria beneath to critically assess the codes and conventions of circulate podcasts to assess its purpose.

codes and conventions of broadcast podcasts

Balance

A podcast must be counterbalanced in order to show both sides of an argument to ensure it in not biased. Both sides of the story must be shown fairly for a podcast to reach this. Balance tin exist considered in terms of the amount of fourth dimension a podcast spends exploring each side of an issue or if the opposing side is given the opportunity to have a voice. This technique allows a podcast to create depth with its subject and present a multifaceted story, in lieu of a single story.

Bias

A good news or documentary podcast dedicates a great bargain of energy to maintain a neutral point of view.  Examples of bias tin can easily exist establish in language. This is why a podcast host chooses his or her language advisedly, or allows the field of study of their podcast to speak. An instance of biased identified from "Megyn Kelly Reports on Alex Jones and Infowars" was Jones's apply of "Liberal Trendies" to draw the victims of Manchester Concert Terrorist attack.

Subjectivity

While a good podcast should maintain a neutral tone that does non hateful that the purpose of the podcast is neutral, or that the podcaster(due south) practise non have an emotional connexion to their subject. In fact, a good podcast will allow the audience to know and understand the personal feelings, tastes, and opinions of the podcaster(s) on an effect or subject. They do this to fully explore the issue, just also pay careful attending to not let their subjective ideas and opinions affect the impartial tone of the podcast.

Opinion

The catchy issue with opinions expressed in podcasts is how to remainder them with facts. A good podcast will oft cite a specific reason based upon a verifiable fact to get in at a claim. Not all opinions are equal. Often, logical fallacies inform our opinions near a subject or issue, so a podcast must carefully examine and analyze the rationale behind opinions they express and the opinions expressed by those they interview.

Representation

Fairly representing a subject field is crucial in an ethical story. Statements that tin can put a person in a false lite or misrepresent someone is non only unethical, but also potentially illegal. This is where language and issues of residual and bias come into play. A good podcast chooses its language carefully to thoughtfully explore an issue without accusing or falling into a logical fallacy.

Objectivity

Being objective in a podcast considers balance, bias, subjectivity, opinion, and representation to allow the viewer to come to their ain conclusions nigh an issue. If a podcast fails to remain objective, then they risk losing credibility with their audience.

Privacy

Privacy is an important ethical business organization for any podcast. The people at the centre of a particular story have specific legal protection from invasion of privacy. Thus, an ethical podcast usually relies upon direct interviews, facts, and data already available in the public domain in lieu of gossip and rumors to ensure that the information portrayed is relevant and in the public interest.

Impartiality

The language used to describe the individuals and bug being discussed in a podcast needs to be impartial. If the tone and language is too impartial, then a podcast risks bias. Having a podcast refer to an act as "evil" or describe someone as "no good" or "rotten" breaks impartiality and brings issues of unfair representation or as well much subjective stance into play instead of facts.

Credibility

A credible podcast will use facts sourced from resources that are checked for accuracy. To do this, a podcast might pull information from news reports, police files, or court documents. Ofttimes, a source of information used in a podcast is a personal interview. Podcasts might complete multiple interviews and ask many people the aforementioned or similar question in order to arrive at the truth. The tricky part well-nigh brownie with a personal interview is that homo sources may not call up verbal details or possibly even lie. A good podcast presents these interviews impartially and closely analyzes their content to nowadays an objective story.

maldonadocovid1986.blogspot.com

Source: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/englishcomp2kscopex92x2/chapter/how-to-analyze-a-podcast/

Share this post